LinkedIn Feed Full of AI Posts? Now You Can Report That It 'Seems Like AI Slop'
However, LinkedIn's Chief Product Officer, Hari Srinivasan, claims, “AI slop is a top priority for all of us.” "We really care about this. People come to LinkedIn to connect with real people and share their real perspectives, ideas, and expertise," he wrote in a post on the platform. It also "lets us tune our models and make better feeds," Srinivasan says.
- ▪However, LinkedIn's Chief Product Officer, Hari Srinivasan, claims, “AI slop is a top priority for all of us.” "We really care about this.
- ▪People come to LinkedIn to connect with real people and share their real perspectives, ideas, and expertise," he wrote in a post on the platform.
- ▪It also "lets us tune our models and make better feeds," Srinivasan says.
10 outlets in our directory ran this story, first to last over 25 hours. Coverage spans 2 points on the political spectrum — 2 lean left, 7 centre.
- ▪ LinkedIn adds a 'Seems like AI slop' button — TNW | Socialmedia
- ▪ Seems Like AI Slop — CNET
- ▪ LinkedIn Adds New ‘Seems Like AI Slop’ Button to Report All the AI Slop — Gizmodo
- ▪ LinkedIn Adds "Seems Like AI Slop" Button on Every Post — Futurism
- ▪ LinkedIn is testing a 'seems like AI slop' reporting tool — Engadget
- ▪ LinkedIn introduces a "seems like AI slop" button to allow users to report posts they think are AI-generated (Joseph Cox/404 Media) — Techmeme
- ▪ LinkedIn actually adds a ‘seems like AI slop’ button — The Verge
- ▪ LinkedIn adds a button to report AI-generated ‘slop’ — TechCrunch
- ▪ LinkedIn Introduces a 'Seems Like AI Slop' Button — 404 Media
PCMag files mainly under tech. We currently carry 353 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | PCMag |
| Canonical URL | https://www.pcmag.com/news/linkedin-feed-full-of-ai-posts-report-that-it-seems-like-ai-slop |
| Publication time | Fri, 31 Jul 26 15:49:03 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-07-31T15:53:07.010Z |
| Last seen | 2026-07-31T15:53:07.010Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | qCLKEcVhtMbv · 10 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
In its latest effort to make an entirely corporate-themed social media platform seem cool, LinkedIn has added a feature where you can flag posts that seem “like AI slop”—its words, not ours.On the surface, it’s a bold move from the Microsoft-owned platform, considering Microsoft has invested billions of dollars into AI and doesn’t seem to be slowing down anytime soon. However, LinkedIn's Chief Product Officer, Hari Srinivasan, claims, “AI slop is a top priority for all of us.” "We really care about this. People come to LinkedIn to connect with real people and share their real perspectives, ideas, and expertise," he wrote in a post on the platform.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at PCMag.