Madras HC to take up today MRK Panneerselvam’s plea to be discharged from 2011 disproportionate assets case
Panneerselvam of the DMK and his family members have approached the Madras High Court to get discharged from a disproportionate assets case booked against them by the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti Corruption (DVAC) in 2011.Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan would be hearing on Monday (July 13, 2026) the criminal revision petition filed jointly by the former Minister, his wife P. Kathiravan against the Cuddalore Principal District and Sessions Court’s June 30, 2026 refusal to discharge them from the case.The charge against the accused was that they were unable to satisfactorily account for ₹3.01 crore in their possession during the check period between April 15, 2006 and March 21, 2011 when Mr.
- ▪Panneerselvam of the DMK and his family members have approached the Madras High Court to get discharged from a disproportionate assets case booked against them by the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti Corruption (DVAC) in 2011.Justice G.K.
- ▪Ilanthiraiyan would be hearing on Monday (July 13, 2026) the criminal revision petition filed jointly by the former Minister, his wife P.
- ▪Kathiravan against the Cuddalore Principal District and Sessions Court’s June 30, 2026 refusal to discharge them from the case.The charge against the accused was that they were unable to satisfactorily account for ₹3.01 crore in their posse
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Former Minister M.R.K. Panneerselvam of the DMK and his family members have approached the Madras High Court to get discharged from a disproportionate assets case booked against them by the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti Corruption (DVAC) in 2011.Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan would be hearing on Monday (July 13, 2026) the criminal revision petition filed jointly by the former Minister, his wife P. Senthamizhselvi and son P. Kathiravan against the Cuddalore Principal District and Sessions Court’s June 30, 2026 refusal to discharge them from the case.The charge against the accused was that they were unable to satisfactorily account for ₹3.01 crore in their possession during the check period between April 15, 2006 and March 21, 2011 when Mr.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Hindu — Top.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from The Hindu — Top
