Malcolm Turnbull says faith in Aukus nuclear submarines deal is 'stark staring bonkers' – video
He says the US’s capacity for building submarines has remained stubbornly laggard, and that it is prevented by its own legislation from selling any submarines to Australia if that would 'degrade' its own fleet. It currently needs to nearly double its submarine production rate, from 1.2 to 2.3 a yearSource: Public Inquiry into AUKUSMon 10 Aug 2026 01.04 EDTShareExplore more on these topicsAukusMalcolm TurnbullAustralian militaryAustralian politics
- ▪He says the US’s capacity for building submarines has remained stubbornly laggard, and that it is prevented by its own legislation from selling any submarines to Australia if that would 'degrade' its own fleet.
- ▪It currently needs to nearly double its submarine production rate, from 1.2 to 2.3 a yearSource: Public Inquiry into AUKUSMon 10 Aug 2026 01.04 EDTShareExplore more on these topicsAukusMalcolm TurnbullAustralian militaryAustralian politics
The Guardian — US files mainly under news. We currently carry 683 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | The Guardian — US |
| Canonical URL | https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2026/aug/10/malcolm-turnbull-says-faith-in-aukus-nuclear-submarines-deal-is-stark-staring-bonkers-video |
| Publication time | Mon, 10 Aug 2026 05:04:24 GMT |
| Retrieval time | 2026-08-10T05:15:42.207Z |
| Last seen | 2026-08-10T05:15:42.207Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | v16dWLrUkMcI · 1 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Malcolm Turnbull says faith in Aukus nuclear submarines deal is 'stark staring bonkers' – videoAukusMalcolm Turnbull says faith in Aukus nuclear submarines deal is 'stark staring bonkers' – videoFormer prime minister Malcolm Turnbull tells a public inquiry that the Aukus deal with the US and UK will probably result in no submarines at all for Australia. He says the US’s capacity for building submarines has remained stubbornly laggard, and that it is prevented by its own legislation from selling any submarines to Australia if that would 'degrade' its own fleet.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Guardian — US.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from The Guardian — US
