Memo urges Republicans to tie Democrats to communism
Twenty-four percent of respondents answered “none of the above.”The political research firm polled 2,634 registered voters from July 13 to 16 through text and landline interviews. The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 1.88%.Advertisement“Call them what they are: Socialists, Marxists, Communists. Communism rings the loudest alarm with constituents (42 percent name it the most dangerous system), so do not retreat to the softer label just because socialism alarms fewer in the abstract,” the firm advised.
- ▪Twenty-four percent of respondents answered “none of the above.”The political research firm polled 2,634 registered voters from July 13 to 16 through text and landline interviews.
- ▪The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 1.88%.Advertisement“Call them what they are: Socialists, Marxists, Communists.
- ▪Communism rings the loudest alarm with constituents (42 percent name it the most dangerous system), so do not retreat to the softer label just because socialism alarms fewer in the abstract,” the firm advised.
Washington Examiner files mainly under politics. We currently carry 1,964 of its stories.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
EXCLUSIVE — A strategic memo prepared for the House Republican Conference advises members to tie socialism and Marxism to communism in their attacks on Democrats, because voters consider the latter “far more dangerous and alarming.”The memo comes as Democrats see a surge of socialist candidates in the 2026 cycle, with the socialist wing of the Democratic Party set to more than double its numbers after the November midterm elections. Recommended Stories Memo urges Republicans to tie Democrats to communism Bipartisan AI oversight bill introduced in House Mike Johnson has victorious week in the House, but Senate roadblocks loom “Americans still hold communism as far more dangerous and alarming than socialism and Marxism,” reads the memo obtained exclusively by the Washington Examiner.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Washington Examiner.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Washington Examiner
