
Multi-Paradigm Agent Interaction in Practice:A Systematic Analysis of Generator-Evaluator, ReAct Loop,and Adversarial Evaluation in the buddyMe Framework
The paper presents a systematic analysis of multi-paradigm agent interaction within the buddyMe framework. It explores three main interaction paradigms and establishes a processing pipeline along with an evaluation schema. The findings highlight the effectiveness of the Generator-Evaluator pre-review and the ReAct loop, while also noting the efficiency of adversarial discussions in content refinement.
- ▪The study identifies three principal agent interaction paradigms: Generator-Evaluator, ReAct Tool-Use Loops, and Memory-Augmented Interaction.
- ▪Generator-Evaluator pre-review detects requirement omissions in 20 percent of complex tasks.
- ▪The ReAct loop ensures stable subtask execution but results in around 30 percent redundant tool invocations.
arXiv cs.AI files mainly under ai research. We currently carry 1,128 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | arXiv cs.AI |
| Canonical URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16821 |
| Publication time | Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 -0400 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-19T04:04:57.272Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-19T04:04:57.272Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | seHZ4YrYMnim |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2605.16821 (cs) [Submitted on 16 May 2026] Title:Multi-Paradigm Agent Interaction in Practice:A Systematic Analysis of Generator-Evaluator, ReAct Loop,and Adversarial Evaluation in the buddyMe Framework Authors:Xiaohua Wang, Chao Han, Kai Yu, XiaoLiang Xu, Liang Wang View a PDF of the paper titled Multi-Paradigm Agent Interaction in Practice:A Systematic Analysis of Generator-Evaluator, ReAct Loop,and Adversarial Evaluation in the buddyMe Framework, by Xiaohua Wang and 4 other authors View PDF Abstract:The rapid evolution of Large Language Model (LLM) agents has produced diverse interaction paradigms, yet few production systems integrate multiple paradigms within a unified architecture.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at arXiv cs.AI.