WeSearch
My New Course at UT Austin: AI Alignment Theory

My New Course at UT Austin: AI Alignment Theory

·12 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 29 views
More from Shtetl-Optimized ai Compare coverage Trending Talk Blindspots Daily Sources Live wire
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

This semester, I’ve been teaching a brand-new course, entitled CS395T AI Alignment Theory. Here’s the course description: The astounding progress of AI over the past decade has been accompanied by a rising fear: do we really understand how to align and control powerful AI systems—how to get them reliably to do what we wanted, or would want them to do on reflection, rather than merely what we said? If we succeed at building general-purpose superhuman intelligences along the current paradigm, should we expect that development to go well for humanity?

Key facts
About this source

Hacker News (AI / LLM) files mainly under ai. We currently carry 7,601 of its stories.

Original article
Shtetl-Optimized
Read full at Shtetl-Optimized →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherShtetl-Optimized
Canonical URLhttps://scottaaronson.blog/?p=10125
Publication timeMon, 05 Oct 2026 02:04:11 +0000
Retrieval time2026-10-05T02:12:14.990Z
Last seen2026-10-05T02:12:14.990Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusterFOY33U86Y4Eq · 1 stories
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

This semester, I’ve been teaching a brand-new course, entitled CS395T AI Alignment Theory. Here’s the course description: The astounding progress of AI over the past decade has been accompanied by a rising fear: do we really understand how to align and control powerful AI systems—how to get them reliably to do what we wanted, or would want them to do on reflection, rather than merely what we said? If we succeed at building general-purpose superhuman intelligences along the current paradigm, should we expect that development to go well for humanity? Can we modify the design, training, monitoring, or scaffolding of those intelligences to help ensure that it goes well? While there’s been a great deal of recent empirical work touching on these questions, this course will concentrate mainly on…

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Shtetl-Optimized.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Shtetl-Optimized