Neovim sweetspot between trad coding and AI coding
The article discusses a new coding tool called Jumpy, designed to provide users with control over AI-assisted coding. Unlike other tools, Jumpy allows for inline prompts and per-hunk acceptance or rejection of changes, ensuring that users can review modifications in real-time. The author expresses a desire for a balance between traditional coding and AI assistance, emphasizing the importance of maintaining control over the coding process.
- ▪Jumpy is designed to allow users to maintain control while using AI to edit code.
- ▪The tool features inline prompts and per-hunk acceptance or rejection of changes.
- ▪The author prefers to handwrite code while utilizing AI, wanting to review changes immediately.
Hacker News (AI / LLM) files mainly under ai. We currently carry 2,856 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | GitHub |
| Canonical URL | https://github.com/cachebag/jumpy |
| Publication time | Mon, 18 May 2026 04:15:30 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-18T04:29:54.381Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-18T04:29:54.381Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | EEEQ3EI2hpYy |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
jumpy Inspired by 99: I, like Prime, wanted a tool to allow for me to still be in the driver seat if I am going to spawn an AI to edit my code. The main difference between jumpy and other tools, like 99, are: feature jumpy avante / sidekick codecompanion inline claude code / aider Interaction model Inline prompt → hunks in buffer Sidebar chat → apply Inline edit → accept/reject CLI agent → full file writes Review granularity Per-hunk accept/reject Per-file or per-suggestion Per-change Post-hoc (git diff) Context switch None: you stay in buffer Sidebar opens Minimal Leave editor or split terminal LLM output format Search/replace blocks Full file / patch Full file Full file via temp Token efficiency High (only changed lines sent back) Lower (full context) Lower Lower Scope Single targeted…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at GitHub.