Never use ChatGPT for these five tasks

Luke James· Sep 23, 2026 · 12:00 PM UTC ·7 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 6 views

More from Engadget tech Compare coverage Trending Talk Blindspots Daily Sources Live wire

TL;DR · WeSearch summary

News AI Never use ChatGPT for these five tasks It's not a lawyer, it's not a doctor and it's definitely not your therapist. 23, 2026 8:00 am EST Smith Collection/gado/Getty Images Add Engadget on Google: Preferred Source Google Discover The roster of people who have self-pwned by typing the wrong information into ChatGPT continues to grow. Samsung engineers, the acting director of America's cyber defense agency, self-represented litigants who provide citations to court cases that don't exist, a man who swapped table salt for sodium bromide after asking how to cut salt from his diet... the list is too long.

Key facts

▪News AI Never use ChatGPT for these five tasks It's not a lawyer, it's not a doctor and it's definitely not your therapist.
▪23, 2026 8:00 am EST Smith Collection/gado/Getty Images Add Engadget on Google: Preferred Source Google Discover The roster of people who have self-pwned by typing the wrong information into ChatGPT continues to grow.
▪Samsung engineers, the acting director of America's cyber defense agency, self-represented litigants who provide citations to court cases that don't exist, a man who swapped table salt for sodium bromide after asking how to cut salt from hi

How this story was covered

2 outlets in our directory ran this story, first to last over 1 hour. All of the coverage we found sits in one bucket: centre. That one-sidedness is itself worth noticing.

Centre · 1

▪ Never Use ChatGPT For These Five Tasks - Engadget — Google News

About this source

Engadget files mainly under tech. We currently carry 885 of its stories.

All Engadget coverage →

Original article

Engadget · Luke James

Read full at Engadget →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record

inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisher	Engadget
Canonical URL	https://www.engadget.com/2265219/chatgpt-tasks-never-use-for/
Publication time	Wed, 23 Sep 2026 12:00:00 +0000
Retrieval time	2026-09-23T14:09:30.753Z
Last seen	2026-09-23T14:09:30.753Z
Headline source	Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt source	publisher body
Excerpt method	First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
Summary	WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source text	contentText
Citation coverage	Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
Cluster	b0qPtS2v0yDb · 2 stories
Cluster logic	Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reason	Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visit	Yes — open original
Substitutes article?	No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared

No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.

Machine-readable

No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.

WeSearch interpretation

WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.

Unknown

Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing	May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)?	Allowed
Snippet	May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown?	Allowed
AI summary	May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article?	Limited
Retrieval / RAG	May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation?	Not asserted
Model training	May the content be used to train AI models?	Not asserted
Commercial reuse	May the content be reused commercially?	Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Open original publisher → Source rights JSON → Machine-readable provenance → Rights framework → WESEARCH-STORY-PROVENANCE-V1

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

News AI Never use ChatGPT for these five tasks It's not a lawyer, it's not a doctor and it's definitely not your therapist. By Luke James Sept. 23, 2026 8:00 am EST Smith Collection/gado/Getty Images Add Engadget on Google: Preferred Source Google Discover The roster of people who have self-pwned by typing the wrong information into ChatGPT continues to grow. Samsung engineers, the acting director of America's cyber defense agency, self-represented litigants who provide citations to court cases that don't exist, a man who swapped table salt for sodium bromide after asking how to cut salt from his diet... the list is too long. Even everyone's favorite all-lowercase techbro CEO Sam Altman concedes that what you're sharing with ChatGPT isn't privileged.

…

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Engadget.

Anonymous · no account needed

Discussion

0 comments