No expectation NZ will revise nuclear-free stance, but there could be disadvantages - expert
An expert states that New Zealand is unlikely to change its nuclear-free stance despite Australia's AUKUS commitment. However, this position may disadvantage New Zealand in terms of naval capabilities and training. The relationship between New Zealand and Australia is reportedly improving, with a focus on defense cooperation.
- ▪Jennifer Parker, an Australian maritime security specialist, believes New Zealand will not revise its nuclear-free stance.
- ▪Parker noted that New Zealand would need to rely on partners for anti-submarine and anti-surface warfare roles due to its lack of submarines.
- ▪New Zealand's Defence Minister Chris Penk suggested a conversation about nuclear policies, but Prime Minister Christopher Luxon quickly dismissed the idea.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Australian maritime security specialist Jennifer Parker. Photo: Supplied/ANU An Australian maritime security specialist says there's no expectation New Zealand would revise its nuclear-free stance based on its neighbour's commitment to AUKUS. However, Jennifer Parker, who served for more than two decades in the Royal Australian Navy and the Department of Defence, said it would disadvantage New Zealand. She said New Zealand - as a country that didn't operate its own submarines - would have to rely on its partners to undertake some of the anti-submarine warfare and anti-surface warfare roles in the event of a crisis or conflict.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at RNZ.