
NO FAKES Act Reintroduced Again — This Time With Additional Support From Spotify and Getty
The NO FAKES Act has been reintroduced in Congress with renewed support from major music industry players like Spotify and Getty. Originally proposed in 2024, the bill aims to protect artists from unauthorized digital replicas, including deepfakes. Critics have raised concerns about potential free speech implications, but the bill's authors assert that it includes safeguards to prevent excessive censorship.
- ▪The NO FAKES Act aims to establish federal rights around likeness for individuals portrayed in digital deepfakes.
- ▪The bill has garnered support from major music companies and tech giants, including Spotify and Getty.
- ▪Critics warn that the legislation could hinder free speech by allowing broad lawsuits over likeness use.
Billboard files mainly under music. We currently carry 358 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Billboard |
| Canonical URL | https://www.billboard.com/pro/ai-deepfakes-bill-no-fakes-reintroduced-congress-again/ |
| Publication time | Wed, 20 May 2026 22:48:29 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-20T23:05:03.117Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-20T23:05:03.117Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | YjwnyOU-pyLk |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Share on Facebook Share on X Google Preferred Share to Flipboard Share on Pinterest + additional share options added Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn Share on Whats App Send an Email Print this article Post a Comment Share on Tumblr Business News 5/20/2026 NO FAKES Act Reintroduced Again — This Time With Additional Support From Spotify and Getty The bill, which is designed to protect artists against "digital replicas," was first proposed in 2024 and reintroduced once before in 2025. By Kristin Robinson Kristin Robinson Senior Writer More Stories by Kristin ¿Es Suno la peor pesadilla de la industria musical o su mayor esperanza? Charlie Puth Explains the Secrets Behind Hit Christmas Songs in New Billboard Video Podcast Interview How Grammys Boss Harvey Mason jr.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Billboard.