WeSearch
No Surprise Here: RX 9050 4GB Is 25% Slower Than 8GB Version

No Surprise Here: RX 9050 4GB Is 25% Slower Than 8GB Version

Jon Martindale· ·3 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 5 views
More from PCMag tech Compare coverage Trending Talk Blindspots Daily Sources Live wire
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

You probably weren't going to buy a PC with a 4GB RX 9050 graphics card, but new test numbers from Hardware Unboxed and Toasty Bros should make sure of it. The GPU is over 25% slower than the 8GB version across a range of games at 1080p Medium/High; in many games, it barely breaks 60fps at 1080p Low.We first heard that AMD was bringing back the aging 4GB GPUs in July, and initial performance tests were rough. Although we didn't expect much, it's always important to wait for well-produced third-party benchmarks with reproducible results.

Key facts
About this source

PCMag files mainly under tech. We currently carry 614 of its stories.

Original article
PCMag · Jon Martindale
Read full at PCMag →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherPCMag
Canonical URLhttps://www.pcmag.com/news/no-surprise-here-rx-9050-4gb-is-25-slower-than-8gb-version
Publication timeMon, 21 Sep 26 15:52:22 +0000
Retrieval time2026-09-21T16:23:49.424Z
Last seen2026-09-21T16:23:49.424Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusterJbnEpLh9JObP · 1 stories
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

You probably weren't going to buy a PC with a 4GB RX 9050 graphics card, but new test numbers from Hardware Unboxed and Toasty Bros should make sure of it. The GPU is over 25% slower than the 8GB version across a range of games at 1080p Medium/High; in many games, it barely breaks 60fps at 1080p Low.We first heard that AMD was bringing back the aging 4GB GPUs in July, and initial performance tests were rough. Although we didn't expect much, it's always important to wait for well-produced third-party benchmarks with reproducible results. Unfortunately, now that we have them, it's clear just how poor this new card's performance is.Hardware Unboxed pulled the 9050 4GB from a weak CyberPowerPC build and paired it with an AMD Ryzen 9800X3D and some GSkill Trident Z5 6000 memory.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at PCMag.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from PCMag