WeSearch

NoWreck v0.4.0 – – Deterministic AI Verifier

·13 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 2 views
#nowreck#deterministic#verifier
NoWreck v0.4.0 – – Deterministic AI Verifier
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

+------------------------------------+ | NoWreck v0.4.0 | | Deterministic AI Verifier | +------------------------------------+ NoWreck is a deterministic verifier for AI coding assistants. Install pipx install . (from a cloned copy of this repo — PyPI publishing coming later) Requires Python 3.10+. NoWreck calls the configured model, gets a diff + claims, and verifies them automatically. nowreck fix --pre PATH --post PATH Pre/Post mode — scan two directory snapshots and detect structural changes.

Key facts
About this source

Hacker News (AI / LLM) files mainly under ai. We currently carry 2,776 of its stories.

Original article
GitHub
Read full at GitHub →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherGitHub
Canonical URLhttps://github.com/AstralXVoid/NoWreck
Publication timeWed, 29 Jul 2026 14:56:06 +0000
Retrieval time2026-07-29T15:03:14.981Z
Last seen2026-07-29T15:03:14.981Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusterZIGOHbmWZDAs · 1 stories
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

+------------------------------------+ | NoWreck v0.4.0 | | Deterministic AI Verifier | +------------------------------------+ NoWreck is a deterministic verifier for AI coding assistants. When an AI changes your code and explains what it did, NoWreck checks whether the explanation matches reality — using structural AST analysis, not another AI's opinion. $ nowreck fix "Add email validation to auth.py" Summary ──────────────────── ● 3 claims total ● 2 confirmed ● 1 contradicted CONFIRMED ✓ ADD_FUNCTION validate_email → auth.py Evidence: Function 'validate_email' was added in auth.py CONTRADICTED ✗ CALLS_FUNCTION validate_email → sanitize_input Evidence: No call to sanitize_input detected in validate_email's body What it catches Hallucinated functions or classes — the AI claims it added…

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at GitHub.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from GitHub