‘Obsession’ has a “plot hole” that “doesn’t make any sense”, says director Curry Barker

Victoria Luxford· May 26, 2026 · 11:56 AM UTC ·14 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 49 views

More from NME music Compare coverage Trending Talk Blindspots Daily Sources Live wire

#film #director #plot hole #sequel #cinema

TL;DR · WeSearch summary

Director Curry Barker has pointed out a significant plot hole in his film 'Obsession', stating that it 'doesn't make any sense'. Despite this critique, he remains optimistic about the film's reception and has shared ideas for a potential sequel. Barker's comments have sparked discussions among fans and critics alike regarding the film's narrative structure.

Key facts

▪Curry Barker, the director of 'Obsession', highlighted a major plot hole in the film.
▪He described the plot hole as something that 'doesn't make any sense'.
▪Barker is considering a sequel to the film, indicating his ongoing commitment to the story.

About this source

NME publishes from United Kingdom and files mainly under music. We currently carry 258 of its stories.

All NME coverage →

Original article

NME · Victoria Luxford

Read full at NME →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record

inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisher	NME
Canonical URL	https://www.nme.com/news/film/obsession-has-a-plot-hole-that-doesnt-make-any-sense-says-director-curry-barker-3947490?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=obsession-has-a-plot-hole-that-doesnt-make-any-sense-says-director-curry-barker
Publication time	Tue, 26 May 2026 11:56:39 +0000
Retrieval time	2026-05-26T12:07:48.662Z
Last seen	2026-05-26T12:07:48.662Z
Headline source	Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt source	publisher body
Excerpt method	First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
Summary	WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source text	contentText
Citation coverage	Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
Cluster	uTo4fiV99Jkg
Cluster logic	Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reason	Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visit	Yes — open original
Substitutes article?	No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared

No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.

Machine-readable

No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.

WeSearch interpretation

WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.

Unknown

Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing	May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)?	Allowed
Snippet	May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown?	Allowed
AI summary	May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article?	Limited
Retrieval / RAG	May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation?	Not asserted
Model training	May the content be used to train AI models?	Not asserted
Commercial reuse	May the content be reused commercially?	Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Open original publisher → Source rights JSON → Machine-readable provenance → Rights framework → WESEARCH-STORY-PROVENANCE-V1

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

/* custom css */ .tdi_66{ min-height: 0; } /* custom css */ .tdi_68, .tdi_68 .tdc-columns{ min-height: 0; }.tdi_68, .tdi_68 .tdc-columns{ display: block; }.tdi_68 .tdc-columns{ width: 100%; } /* inline tdc_css att */ .tdi_68{ padding-top:24px !important; padding-bottom:18px !important; } .tdi_68 .td_block_wrap{ text-align:left } /* custom css */ .tdi_70{ vertical-align: baseline; }.tdi_70 > .wpb_wrapper, .tdi_70 > .wpb_wrapper > .tdc-elements{ display: block; }.tdi_70 > .wpb_wrapper > .tdc-elements{ width: 100%; }.tdi_70 > .wpb_wrapper > .vc_row_inner{ width: auto; }.tdi_70 > .wpb_wrapper{ width: auto; height: auto; } /* custom css */ .tdb-breadcrumbs{ margin-bottom: 11px; font-size: 12px; color: #747474; line-height: 18px; }.tdb-breadcrumbs a{ color: #747474; }.tdb-breadcrumbs a:hover{…

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at NME.

Anonymous · no account needed

Discussion

0 comments