On the Uniqueness of the Holocaust
Politics On the Uniqueness of the Holocaust David Bernstein | 7.20.2026 8:24 AM A colleague on an academic list asked if I agreed that the Holocaust wasn't unique, but just one of a series of modern genocides. And the factor that I think makes the Holocaust most interesting is that the standard genocide involves a longstanding real conflict between different national/religious/ethnic groups. In contrast, the conflict between Germans ("Aryans") and Jews ("Judeo-Bolsheviks") was almost entirely in the Nazi imagination.
- ▪Politics On the Uniqueness of the Holocaust David Bernstein | 7.20.2026 8:24 AM A colleague on an academic list asked if I agreed that the Holocaust wasn't unique, but just one of a series of modern genocides.
- ▪And the factor that I think makes the Holocaust most interesting is that the standard genocide involves a longstanding real conflict between different national/religious/ethnic groups.
- ▪In contrast, the conflict between Germans ("Aryans") and Jews ("Judeo-Bolsheviks") was almost entirely in the Nazi imagination.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Politics On the Uniqueness of the Holocaust David Bernstein | 7.20.2026 8:24 AM A colleague on an academic list asked if I agreed that the Holocaust wasn't unique, but just one of a series of modern genocides. Here is how I responded: On the contrary, I'd say that (a) the Holocaust was not unique only in that genocide is not unique; (b) all genocides are unique, as each has its own causes and trajectory; and (c) that there are unique aspects of the Holocaust that differntiate in ways that make it worth studying, for example (some of these are more important than others, but all are interesting): (1) Unlike the typical genocide, it involved multiple countries, governments, and the participation of dozens of different cultural, religious, ethnic, and linguistic groups as perpetrators; (2)…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Reason.com.