People building AI think it might kill everyone. Hear from them directly.
The massive response to Jacob Coxon’s and Evan Hubinger’s tweets showed that there is a lot of demand from the world to hear from employees at frontier AI companies about what is happening with the technology.We believe the general public does not realize that the people…
- ▪The massive response to Jacob Coxon’s and Evan Hubinger’s tweets showed that there is a lot of demand from the world to hear from employees at frontier AI companies about what is happening with the technology.We believe the general public d
Hacker News (AI / LLM) files mainly under ai. We currently carry 6,863 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | frominside.ai |
| Canonical URL | https://frominside.ai |
| Publication time | Tue, 29 Sep 2026 15:05:39 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-09-29T15:16:39.637Z |
| Last seen | 2026-09-29T15:16:39.637Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | FeUfZ4DUjDrz · 1 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
The massive response to Jacob Coxon’s and Evan Hubinger’s tweets showed that there is a lot of demand from the world to hear from employees at frontier AI companies about what is happening with the technology.We believe the general public does not realize that the people building frontier AI earnestly consider, or even take for granted, truly extreme possibilities like some of those shared in this series.Our goal with this project is to open up a direct channel from the people working on this technology to the public.We at Palisade generally agree with Jacob Coxon that the AI companies are “gambling with our lives.” We think that few people in the world understand the situation we’re all in, but if the public did understand, human civilization would have a better chance of reaching an…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at frominside.ai.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from frominside.ai
