Personal policy for AI/LLM driven contribution
Obviously this will have some false positive and false negative, but if someone tutored his AI enough for me to not recognize it as an automatically generated contribution, and the contribution do bring value to the projects I work on than is OK to accept it. On the other side if a human user do so little effort to do a contribution that looks like a cheap "AI" maybe he should pay me! So yes "AI" contributions are more than welcome, you can find the sponsor links on this website, some of them have also plan specific to AI contributions, consider that your contribution should at least match the one that you give to your "AI" provider.
- ▪Obviously this will have some false positive and false negative, but if someone tutored his AI enough for me to not recognize it as an automatically generated contribution, and the contribution do bring value to the projects I work on than
- ▪On the other side if a human user do so little effort to do a contribution that looks like a cheap "AI" maybe he should pay me!
- ▪So yes "AI" contributions are more than welcome, you can find the sponsor links on this website, some of them have also plan specific to AI contributions, consider that your contribution should at least match the one that you give to your "
Hacker News (AI / LLM) files mainly under ai. We currently carry 3,987 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Tglman |
| Canonical URL | https://www.tglman.com/posts/personal-policy-for-ai-driven-contributions.html |
| Publication time | Fri, 07 Aug 2026 13:55:30 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-08-07T14:05:44.990Z |
| Last seen | 2026-08-07T14:05:44.990Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | 3zwtgI2mI7Ea · 1 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Personal Policy for AI driven contributions 2026-07-18 Since 2025 things started to change in the software industry, a new tool was in town, the "AI", this new tool is rapidly changing the way people work in software development, enabling people that are not able or don't have time to learn how to code to build software, even at a faster peace of an expert developer, this has also an impact on open source development with a new wave of projects and contributors to existing projects, that come from people with not strictly technical background, or also "traditional" expert developer that contribute without the need to go through all the technical details of a project.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Tglman.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Tglman
