WeSearch
Pi.dev: You Said No MCP

Pi.dev: You Said No MCP

·7 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 90 views
More from Earendil programming Compare coverage Trending Talk Blindspots Daily Sources Live wire
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

The Pi development team has officially integrated Model Context Protocol (MCP) support into the core of their platform, reversing their previous stance of exclusion. This decision was driven by the evolution of MCP standards and the realization that core integration enables better compatibility with other features like Jev and modern LLM capabilities. The team aims to actively shape the MCP ecosystem by implementing a 'Codemode' approach that treats MCP tools similarly to OpenAPI specifications for improved composition and efficiency.

Key facts
About this source

Hacker News (Front Page) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 2,306 of its stories. Top-voted stories on Hacker News.

Original article
Earendil
Read full at Earendil →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherEarendil
Canonical URLhttps://earendil.com/posts/you-said-no-mcp/
Publication timeWed, 30 Sep 2026 09:55:23 +0000
Retrieval time2026-09-30T10:26:55.877Z
Last seen2026-09-30T10:26:55.877Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusterH_fdkefh9dAO · 1 stories
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

“You Said No MCP!” Date:Tue, 29 Sep 2026 From:Earendil Engineering <[email protected]> To:You Subject:“You Said No MCP!” If you went to pi.dev in the past, you found a proud declaration that Pi does not support MCP. If you listen to podcasts where we talked about Pi, you will have found more than one dismissive statement about MCP from us. Including a post by Mario about it. And yet, if you upgrade to Pi you will find MCP is now a supported piece of functionality. What happened? Things Change The first thing to remember is that the world is not static. We have been paying attention to MCP over the last year and the MCP of today is not the MCP of yesteryear. That alone would not be much of a reason to put it into the core, however.

…

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Earendil.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Earendil