WeSearch
Postgres isn't slow, your storage is

Postgres isn't slow, your storage is

·7 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 5 views
More from ClickHouse programming Compare coverage Trending Talk Blindspots Daily Sources Live wire
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

At POSETTE 2026, Sai Srirampur presented "Postgres Isn’t Slow. Your Storage Is." a talk examining how storage affects PostgreSQL performance at scale. This post recaps the benchmark, what the results revealed, and the architecture proposed for running PostgreSQL on local NVMe in production.

Key facts
About this source

Hacker News (Front Page) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 2,638 of its stories. Top-voted stories on Hacker News.

Original article
ClickHouse
Read full at ClickHouse →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherClickHouse
Canonical URLhttps://clickhouse.com/blog/posette-talk-recap-postgres-isnt-slow-your-storage-is
Publication timeMon, 12 Oct 2026 06:36:53 +0000
Retrieval time2026-10-12T08:04:54.234Z
Last seen2026-10-12T08:04:54.234Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
Clusterl0S4LPD0Yhm7
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

At POSETTE 2026, Sai Srirampur presented "Postgres Isn’t Slow. Your Storage Is." a talk examining how storage affects PostgreSQL performance at scale. This post recaps the benchmark, what the results revealed, and the architecture proposed for running PostgreSQL on local NVMe in production. You can watch the full talk in the video linked below. The talk starts with several symptoms teams running Postgres at scale may recognize: ingestion slows down, P95 read latency becomes unpredictable, autovacuum falls behind, checkpoints compete with your actual workload for resources, or logical replication accumulates lag. These problems do not always share the same cause, but they can have a common one that is easy to overlook: storage performance.

…

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at ClickHouse.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from ClickHouse