Probing Embodied LLMs: When Higher Observation Fidelity Hurts Problem Solving
A recent study explores the performance of embodied large language models (LLMs) in robotic tasks. The research indicates that LLMs perform better with lower observation fidelity, such as raw RGB input, compared to higher fidelity observations. This counterintuitive finding suggests that success rates may be influenced by perceptual errors rather than robust problem-solving capabilities.
- ▪Embodied LLMs were evaluated using a mechanical puzzle called the Lockbox.
- ▪Agents performed best under raw RGB input and worst under perfect ground-truth observations.
- ▪Moderate noise in perceived action outcomes improved performance, peaking at a 40% flip probability.
arXiv cs.AI files mainly under ai research. We currently carry 1,128 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | arXiv cs.AI |
| Canonical URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20072 |
| Publication time | Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 -0400 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-20T04:04:59.484Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-20T04:04:59.484Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | Jl_pOdaNvYv9 |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2605.20072 (cs) [Submitted on 19 May 2026] Title:Probing Embodied LLMs: When Higher Observation Fidelity Hurts Problem Solving Authors:Oussama Zenkri, Oliver Brock View a PDF of the paper titled Probing Embodied LLMs: When Higher Observation Fidelity Hurts Problem Solving, by Oussama Zenkri and Oliver Brock View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large Language Models are increasingly proposed as cognitive components for robotic systems, yet their opaque decision processes make it difficult to explain success or failure in closed-loop embodied tasks. Following an empirical AI methodology, we study embodied LLM agents behaviorally by varying the information available to the agent and measuring the resulting changes in behavior.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at arXiv cs.AI.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from arXiv cs.AI
