WeSearch
Query-Conditioned Graph Retrieval for Contextualized LLM Reasoning in Personalized Wearable Data

Query-Conditioned Graph Retrieval for Contextualized LLM Reasoning in Personalized Wearable Data

·3 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 40 views
More from arXiv cs.AI ai research Compare coverage Trending Talk Blindspots Daily Sources Live wire
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

The article discusses a new framework called Wearable As Graph (WAG) designed for analyzing personalized wearable data using large language models (LLMs). WAG addresses the challenge of context selection by organizing wearable metrics into a personalized knowledge graph and retrieving relevant subgraphs for improved reasoning. Evaluation results indicate that WAG significantly outperforms existing methods in terms of effectiveness for LLM-driven analysis of wearable data.

Key facts
About this source

arXiv cs.AI files mainly under ai research. We currently carry 1,128 of its stories.

Original article
arXiv cs.AI
Read full at arXiv cs.AI →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherarXiv cs.AI
Canonical URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18763
Publication timeWed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 -0400
Retrieval time2026-05-20T04:04:59.484Z
Last seen2026-05-20T04:04:59.484Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
Cluster4cL9ZxmeXXpB
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Computer Science > Information Retrieval arXiv:2605.18763 (cs) [Submitted on 10 Apr 2026] Title:Query-Conditioned Graph Retrieval for Contextualized LLM Reasoning in Personalized Wearable Data Authors:Zhenyu Lu, Mahyar Abbasian, Amir M. Rahmani View a PDF of the paper titled Query-Conditioned Graph Retrieval for Contextualized LLM Reasoning in Personalized Wearable Data, by Zhenyu Lu and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to analyzing wearable sensing data, which are long-term, multimodal, and highly personalized. A key challenge is context selection: providing insufficient context limits reasoning, while including all available data leads to inefficiency and degraded generation quality.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at arXiv cs.AI.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from arXiv cs.AI