Quick Win Card #01 — Your backlog.md lied to you (a 30-second cure)
The article discusses the importance of trusting the source of information over human-edited summaries. It highlights a personal experience where a status file misled the author about the state of their articles. The author emphasizes that once a status file lies, it can lead to a loss of trust in one's own tools.
- ▪The author discovered that their status file inaccurately indicated that four articles were still drafts when they had already been published.
- ▪This discrepancy was caused by a failure to run a synchronization script that updates the status file.
- ▪The author warns that relying on manually edited status files can lead to cognitive tax and loss of trust in tools.
DEV.to (Top) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 4,877 of its stories.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 3897818) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } Michel Faure Posted on May 25 • Originally published at dev.to Quick Win Card #01 — Your backlog.md lied to you (a 30-second cure) #claudecode #productivity #webdev #devops My ERP with Claude Code (34 Part Series) 1 How much are 91,000 lines produced with Claude Code actually worth? 2 Supabase RLS in production: four traps that silence your queries ... 30 more parts...
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).
Discussion
0 commentsMore from DEV.to (Top)
