Removable batteries aren't coming back. Good — they sucked

Mark Jansen· Apr 28, 2026 · 4:15 PM UTC ·7 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 20 views

#technology #smartphones #batteries #eu_regulations #e-waste

Removable batteries aren't coming back. Good — they sucked

TL;DR · WeSearch summary

The EU is set to implement rules in 2027 requiring easily replaceable batteries in smartphones and tablets to reduce e-waste, but this does not mean a return to user-removable batteries. Most high-end phones already meet exemption criteria based on battery longevity and durability standards. The article argues that reverting to old-style removable batteries would be a step backward in design and functionality.

Key facts

▪The EU will mandate easily replaceable batteries in smartphones and tablets starting in 2027 to reduce electronic waste.
▪Devices are exempt if their batteries retain 80% capacity after 1,000 charge cycles and have at least an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance.
▪Apple iPhones, Google Pixel phones, and Samsung phones already meet or exceed these requirements, allowing them to keep sealed battery designs.
▪The new rules do not require user-removable batteries, only that batteries be replaceable, likely by professionals.
▪The article contends that older removable battery designs were inferior and that modern sealed batteries offer better performance and durability.

About this source

Android Police files mainly under tech. We currently carry 339 of its stories.

All Android Police coverage →

Original article

Android Police · Mark Jansen

Read full at Android Police →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record

inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisher	Android Police
Canonical URL	https://www.androidpolice.com/we-arent-getting-removable-batteries-back-and-they-kinda-sucked-anyway/
Publication time	Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:15:12 GMT
Retrieval time	2026-04-28T16:37:43.353Z
Last seen	2026-04-28T16:37:43.353Z
Headline source	Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt source	publisher body
Excerpt method	First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
Summary	WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source text	contentText
Citation coverage	Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
Cluster	gXp0ji7OX5q5
Cluster logic	Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reason	Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visit	Yes — open original
Substitutes article?	No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared

No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.

Machine-readable

No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.

WeSearch interpretation

WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.

Unknown

Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing	May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)?	Allowed
Snippet	May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown?	Allowed
AI summary	May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article?	Limited
Retrieval / RAG	May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation?	Not asserted
Model training	May the content be used to train AI models?	Not asserted
Commercial reuse	May the content be reused commercially?	Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Open original publisher → Source rights JSON → Machine-readable provenance → Rights framework → WESEARCH-STORY-PROVENANCE-V1

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "1", "name": "Home", "item": "https://www.androidpolice.com/" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position":"2", "name": "Phones", "item": "https://www.androidpolice.com/phones/" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position":"3", "name": "Phones Features", "item": "https://www.androidpolice.com/phones-features/" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position":"4", "name": "Removable batteries aren't coming back. Good \u2014 they sucked", "item": "https://www.androidpolice.com/we-arent-getting-removable-batteries-back-and-they-kinda-sucked-anyway/" } ] } Removable batteries aren't coming back.

…

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Android Police.

Anonymous · no account needed

Discussion

0 comments