RSS is not dead. It just changed audience
RSS has evolved from a tool for human readers to a valuable resource for AI crawlers. This shift has led to a resurgence in its usage, as machines now rely on RSS for structured content access. Despite its changing audience, the fundamental value of RSS remains intact, providing clarity and structure.
- ▪RSS was originally designed for human readers but has found new life with AI crawlers.
- ▪The majority of traffic on many independent sites now comes from automated systems rather than human visitors.
- ▪Publishers have historically had mixed feelings about RSS due to its direct content delivery without analytics or ad impressions.
Hacker News (Newest) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 5,306 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Rob Hoeijmakers |
| Canonical URL | https://hoeijmakers.net/rss-is-not-dead-it-just-changed-audience/ |
| Publication time | Mon, 18 May 2026 19:25:00 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-18T19:34:56.983Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-18T19:34:56.983Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | Xu2PllIqx0Vt |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
AI in Practice RSS is not dead. It just changed audience. RSS was built for human readers who wanted control. It turns out that description fits AI crawlers perfectly. The format found a second life it never asked for. Rob Hoeijmakers 15 May 2026 • 2 min read Share My RSS feed gets more traffic than my homepage. Not from subscribers with a feed reader open on a Sunday morning. From machines.RSS, Really Simple Syndication, is the quiet pipe that lets you follow a website without visiting it. Old technology, XML-based, pre-social-media, designed in an era when "web application" meant a browser and a human. Publishers quietly stopped promoting it. Google Reader closed.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Rob Hoeijmakers.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Rob Hoeijmakers
