Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. Vivo X300 Ultra: My results after camera-testing the Android phones
The camera performance of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Vivo X300 Ultra was compared in a recent test. While the Vivo X300 Ultra was expected to outperform the Galaxy S26 Ultra, the latter surprised in several areas. Ultimately, the choice between the two phones depends on personal shooting preferences and styles.
- ▪The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 200MP main camera with a 23mm focal length, while the Vivo X300 Ultra also has a 200MP main camera but with a 35mm focal length.
- ▪The Vivo X300 Ultra's larger sensor provided more depth in images, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra suffered from oversharpening.
- ▪Shooting preferences varied, with some users favoring the 23mm focal length of the Galaxy S26 Ultra for certain compositions.
ZDNet files mainly under tech. We currently carry 490 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | ZDNet |
| Canonical URL | https://www.zdnet.com/article/samsung-galaxy-s26-ultra-vs-vivo-x300-ultra-camera-comparison/ |
| Publication time | Wed, 03 Jun 2026 01:00:39 GMT |
| Retrieval time | 2026-06-03T01:39:28.247Z |
| Last seen | 2026-06-03T01:39:28.247Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | pQOPdLdWfn-l |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Tech Home Tech Smartphones Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. Vivo X300 Ultra: My results after camera-testing the Android phones I expected the Vivo X300 Ultra to wipe the floor with Samsung's Galaxy S26 Ultra, but the latter impressed me in ways I didn't expect. Written by Prakhar Khanna, Contributing WriterContributing Writer June 2, 2026 at 6:00 p.m. PT Prakhar Khanna/ZDNETFollow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is one of the best phones you can buy right now. However, outside the US, it is facing tough competition from Chinese ultra phones, the latest being Vivo's X300 Ultra. It takes on the Samsung phone with a camera system that's packed with not one or two, but three massive sensors.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at ZDNet.