WeSearch

Skipping sleep may pack on pounds faster than you think, new study finds

·4 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 2 views
#skipping#sleep#pack#pounds#faster
Skipping sleep may pack on pounds faster than you think, new study finds
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

Health Skipping sleep may pack on pounds faster than you think, new study finds By Kelly McGreal , Fox News Published July 26, 2026, 9:55 p.m. A study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine found that adults who got about 90 minutes less sleep each night for six weeks gained roughly one pound on average compared with periods when they got enough rest. Researchers at Columbia University Irving Medical Center studied 95 adults who were already at risk for heart or metabolic disease, comparing six weeks of adequate sleep with six weeks of cutting about 90 minutes of sleep each night.

Key facts
How this story was covered

2 outlets in our directory ran this story, first to last over 5 hours. All of the coverage we found sits in one bucket: right. That one-sidedness is itself worth noticing.

Right · 1
About this source

New York Post files mainly under news. We currently carry 10,001 of its stories.

Original article
New York Post
Read full at New York Post →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Health Skipping sleep may pack on pounds faster than you think, new study finds By Kelly McGreal , Fox News Published July 26, 2026, 9:55 p.m. ET (function() { var overlay = document.getElementById("nyp-player-lcp-overlay"); if (!overlay) { return; } function hideOverlay() { overlay.remove(); } function afterDCL() { requestAnimationFrame(hideOverlay); } if (document.readyState === "loading") { document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", afterDCL, { once: true }); } else { afterDCL(); } })(); See more of our coverage in your search results.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at New York Post.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from New York Post