Southwest and United don't want Boeing's newest 737 MAX software on their new planes
TechSpot means tech analysis and advice you can trust. In a nutshell: Southwest Airlines and United Airlines have asked Boeing to deliver new 737 MAX jets with an earlier software version after the manufacturer identified a glitch involving an automated navigation function. Neither airline has aircraft flying with the affected software, according to company statements.
- ▪TechSpot means tech analysis and advice you can trust.
- ▪In a nutshell: Southwest Airlines and United Airlines have asked Boeing to deliver new 737 MAX jets with an earlier software version after the manufacturer identified a glitch involving an automated navigation function.
- ▪Neither airline has aircraft flying with the affected software, according to company statements.
TechSpot files mainly under tech. We currently carry 583 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | TechSpot |
| Canonical URL | https://www.techspot.com/news/114009-southwest-united-dont-want-boeing-newest-737-max.html |
| Publication time | Mon, 28 Sep 2026 14:44 -0500 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-09-28T19:45:21.121Z |
| Last seen | 2026-09-28T19:45:21.121Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | MlNM-jJSD0_g · 1 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Software Industry boeing transportation Southwest and United don't want Boeing's newest 737 MAX software on their new planes A navigation glitch can leave pilots without some autopilot functions until they restore the system By Skye Jacobs September 28, 2026, 14:44 Add TechSpot Serving tech enthusiasts for over 25 years. TechSpot means tech analysis and advice you can trust. In a nutshell: Southwest Airlines and United Airlines have asked Boeing to deliver new 737 MAX jets with an earlier software version after the manufacturer identified a glitch involving an automated navigation function. Neither airline has aircraft flying with the affected software, according to company statements. However, both carriers have told Boeing they do not want it installed on incoming planes.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at TechSpot.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from TechSpot
