Speccing Is the New Coding
The article discusses the evolving role of source code in software development, suggesting that 'speccing' may replace traditional coding. As machines become more capable of understanding processes, the need for extensive source code may diminish. The author introduces SpecPack, a set of standards aimed at facilitating this transition towards a more direct specification of applications.
- ▪The traditional role of source code is being questioned as machines become more adept at understanding processes.
- ▪The author has published SpecPack, which includes three reference standards to support this shift.
- ▪MiniMark simplifies Markdown for machine understanding by removing optionality.
- ▪riVer introduces a versioning scheme for textual content that aligns with a future where traditional version control may not be necessary.
- ▪Specify aims to establish coding standards in plain English for better communication with intelligent agents.
DEV.to (Top) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 4,924 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | DEV.to (Top) |
| Canonical URL | https://dev.to/newadventuresinit/speccing-is-the-new-coding-493g |
| Publication time | Mon, 25 May 2026 10:48:20 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-25T11:07:36.652Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-25T11:07:36.652Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | None |
| Cluster logic | Not yet clustered, or no peer story found in the clustering window. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 3937640) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } Dirk Mattig Posted on May 25 Speccing Is the New Coding #agents #ai #softwaredevelopment What do we still need source code for? It is an odd question to ask after spending forty years writing it, but it is the one that keeps pulling at my sleeve. Let me work backwards to explain why. The first computers were one-trick ponies. Their behavior was baked into their wiring — change the task, change the machine. Useful, expensive, inflexible.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).