Stop Using LLMs Like Giant Problem Solvers
The article discusses the challenges of using large language models (LLMs) for processing messy data, specifically in transforming compliance PDFs into structured JSON rules. The author shares insights on improving the process by simplifying the agent's tasks and handling data iteratively. Key lessons include preparing source data in advance and separating responsibilities between semantic understanding and mechanical processing.
- ▪The initial approach to using LLMs resulted in inaccuracies and broad rules due to the messy nature of the source data.
- ▪The author found that simplifying the agent's tasks and preparing data upfront significantly improved the output quality.
- ▪Processing documents iteratively allowed for easier inspection, retries, and auditing of the results.
Towards Data Science files mainly under ai. We currently carry 106 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Towards Data Science |
| Canonical URL | https://towardsdatascience.com/stop-using-llms-like-giant-problem-solvers/ |
| Publication time | Tue, 26 May 2026 13:30:00 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-26T13:32:49.489Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-26T13:32:49.489Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | BHagiw3BpJfX |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
LLM Applications Stop Using LLMs Like Giant Problem Solvers How I turned 100 messy pdfs into structured insights by building a deterministic loop around agents Clara Chong May 26, 2026 6 min read Share Image by Wesley Tingey from Unsplash I recently worked on a feature where I had to transform 100 messy compliance pdfs into structured JSON rules. The brute force approach was obvious: give the agent the source text, explain the task, provide examples, and ask it to generate the rules. Since it was the lowest-hanging fruit, I tried it first. At a glance, the output looked fine. The output JSON was valid and matched what I expected. But as I was manually sampling the results to check for accuracy, the cracks appeared. Some rules were too broad, others were missed.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Towards Data Science.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Towards Data Science
