WeSearch

The Accordion Pattern: Why I stopped writing one fat LLM prompt

·5 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 13 views
#ai#llm#data-extraction
The Accordion Pattern: Why I stopped writing one fat LLM prompt
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

The article discusses the limitations of using a single large prompt for extracting structured data from long documents. The author introduces the 'Accordion Pattern' as a more effective method that involves breaking the task into two stages: segmenting the document and then extracting data from each segment. This approach improves reliability, reduces latency, and allows for better error handling.

Key facts
Original article
DEV.to (Top)
Read full at DEV.to (Top) →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 3903757) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } Hideki Mori Posted on Apr 29 The Accordion Pattern: Why I stopped writing one fat LLM prompt #llm #ai #architecture #api Solo engineering notes (3 Part Series) 1 The Accordion Pattern: Why I stopped writing one fat LLM prompt 2 Nobody knows when a job will finish. I'd still like to report it accurately. 3 What survives when you build alone for 24 years Most structured-extraction tutorials look the same.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from DEV.to (Top)