The British public have taken a dim view of the king’s visit.
King Charles III delivered a speech to Congress and attended a state dinner at the White House during a visit aimed at strengthening U.S.-UK relations amid diplomatic tensions between President Trump and Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The king emphasized shared history and security cooperation without directly addressing current disputes, including disagreements over the U.S.-Israeli war in Iran. The trip, marked by tight security and high-profile events, also includes stops in New York City and Virginia. Public reaction in Britain to the visit has been largely negative.
- ▪King Charles III addressed a joint session of Congress, highlighting the enduring U.S.-UK alliance and shared democratic values.
- ▪President Trump hosted Charles and Queen Camilla at a state dinner attended by top U.S. officials, justices, and conservative figures.
- ▪The king referenced his Royal Navy service and affirmed Britain’s increased defense spending, subtly countering Trump’s criticisms.
- ▪The visit includes events in New York and Virginia, such as a stop at the 9/11 memorial and Arlington National Cemetery.
- ▪British public opinion on the trip has been unfavorable, reflecting broader skepticism about the monarchy's role and diplomatic impact.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
LiveUpdated April 28, 2026, 9:49 p.m. ETLive Updates: King Charles Stresses Cooperation in Speech to CongressThe British monarch’s trip is intended in part to repair strained U.S.-British ties. President Trump is hosting Charles and Queen Camilla at a state dinner at the White House.State DinnerKenny Holston/The New York TimesKing Charles Addressing CongressSalwan Georges for The New York TimesIn the Oval OfficeKenny Holston/The New York TimesState Visit Arrival CeremonyKenny Holston/The New York TimesSalwan Georges for The New York TimesKenny Holston/The New York TimesSalwan Georges for The New York TimesKenny Holston/The New York…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at NYT — World.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from NYT — World
