The Company Behind Ugly Gold Phones Is Now Making Ugly Gold Smart Glasses
Caviar, a company known for creating expensive gold-covered phones, has released a new product called Odyssey, a pair of Ray-Ban Meta AI smart glasses covered in 24-karat gold. The Odyssey smart glasses are priced at $6,840, with a less expensive silver version available for $6,130. Both versions come with a genuine alligator skin case and are limited to only 24 pieces, making them a unique and exclusive product for the wealthy.
- ▪Caviar's Odyssey smart glasses are a gold-covered version of the Ray-Ban Meta AI glasses.
- ▪The Odyssey smart glasses are priced at $6,840, with a silver version available for $6,130.
- ▪Only 24 pieces of the Odyssey smart glasses will be made, each coming with a genuine alligator skin case.
Gizmodo files mainly under tech. We currently carry 833 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Gizmodo |
| Canonical URL | https://gizmodo.com/the-company-behind-ugly-gold-phones-is-now-making-ugly-gold-smart-glasses-2000795594 |
| Publication time | Thu, 06 Aug 2026 20:20:19 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-08-06T20:25:48.049Z |
| Last seen | 2026-08-06T20:25:48.049Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | LAuxI6Bypu1W · 1 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Smart glasses have enjoyed quite a few rites of passage this year. There’s been widespread backlash and prohibition, Kardashian-adjacent endorsements with glitzy ad campaigns, and Lorde got in on the action to say, “… f*ck the glasses.” Even with all of that, the landmarks aren’t done quite yet—there’s still some juice in the smart glasses going mainstream tank, and this particular flavor of juice is full of garish gold…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Gizmodo.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Gizmodo
