The Daily Wire vs. US State Department
The Daily Wire, LLC and the State of Texas filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of State, resulting in a consent decree approved by the Eastern District of Texas. The court upheld jurisdiction and venue, ruling that the case could proceed in that district. The agreement resolves all claims in the complaint and will remain in effect until January 31, 2036.
- ▪The court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and venue is proper in the Eastern District of Texas.
- ▪The consent decree was signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on April 8, 2026.
- ▪The agreement is binding on all parties, their officials, agents, employees, assigns, and successors.
- ▪Only the named parties can enforce the agreement, with the Texas Attorney General authorized to act on behalf of the state.
- ▪The term 'domestic media outlet' includes U.S.-based news providers but excludes foreign state and non-state actors.
Hacker News (Newest) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 5,306 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | CourtListener |
| Canonical URL | https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68065253/131/the-daily-wire-llc-v-united-states-department-of-state/ |
| Publication time | Sun, 17 May 2026 09:21:30 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-17T09:52:13.040Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-17T09:52:13.040Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | 5u_q-vnS_Ixw |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
The Daily Wire, LLC v. United States Department of State × Please Sign In or Register Sign In Register × If you use PACER, please install RECAP Launched in 2010, the RECAP extension is a free tool for your browser that helps us collect the content you see on CourtListener. Once installed, anything you buy on PACER gets automatically added to the RECAP Archive and anything another RECAP user has bought is automatically free to you. Continue to PACER Learn More… × Congratulations on your first request! By clicking 🙏, you used 1 of your 5 daily prayers asking somebody to buy a document for you from PACER. Your prayer will now show up on our leaderboard of most-wanted PACER documents, and when the community buys it for you, we'll send you an email to let you know.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at CourtListener.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from CourtListener
