WeSearch

The Global Population Could Crash by 2064, New Model Suggests

3 sources covered this ⚠ Left-only compare →
Coverage diverges in the emphasis placed on the implications of the model. Phys.org and r/science present the findings in a straightforward manner, focusing on the model's methodology and predictions without sensationalizing the outcomes.…
Ellyn Lapointe· ·3 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 11 views
#population#environment#crisis
The Global Population Could Crash by 2064, New Model Suggests
⚡ TL;DR · AI summary

A new study suggests that the global population could decline significantly by 2064 if a major catastrophe occurs. The research indicates that if Earth's carrying capacity dropped to around 2 billion, the population could halve from approximately 8 billion to 4 billion. The findings are not predictions but rather scenarios illustrating the sensitivity of population dynamics to environmental changes.

Key facts
Original article
Gizmodo · Ellyn Lapointe
Read full at Gizmodo →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

As the global population rises, climate change, disease, war, resource strain, and other crises threaten to drastically reduce Earth’s carrying capacity for humanity—the maximum number of people that can sustainably live on our planet. A new study suggests that if a global catastrophe struck today, we could see a rapid population decline over the next several decades.cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({"playerId":"92b7b46b-43ed-4e0e-b21b-2c999302d9d7","settings":{"advertising":{"macros":{"AD_UNIT":"/23178111854/od.gizmodo.com/article","CHILD_UNIT":"article","POST_ID":"2000763453","POST_TYPE":"post","CHANNEL":"science","SECTION":"biology","SUBSECTION":"","CATEGORIES":"biology","TAGS":"disasters,mathematics,population","NOP":"0"},"timeBeforeFirstAd":0}}}).render("cnx-player-main")}); The findings,…

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Gizmodo.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Gizmodo