The Hidden Reason GRC Programs Keep Failing: It's a Design Problem, Not a People Problem
Many organizations struggle with Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) programs due to poor design rather than issues with people or platforms. A well-engineered GRC program requires clear ownership, integrated processes, and active risk management, while an assembled program often leads to compliance artifacts without effective governance. Identifying structural problems early can help organizations build more resilient GRC systems.
- ▪Organizations often start GRC programs by evaluating platforms and mapping controls, leading to ineffective governance.
- ▪A well-designed GRC program requires clear ownership of controls and integration into daily operations.
- ▪Common signs of a poorly designed GRC program include vague ownership of controls and treating audit preparation as a separate project.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 108873) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } Neviar Rawlinson, MBA Posted on May 26 • Originally published at Medium The Hidden Reason GRC Programs Keep Failing: It's a Design Problem, Not a People Problem #grc #governance #security #career Most organizations building a GRC program start in the wrong place. They evaluate platforms. They assign analysts. They map controls to a framework and document everything carefully.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).
Discussion
0 commentsMore from DEV.to (Top)
