The last six months in LLMs in five minutes
The advancements in coding agents have become significant over the past six months. OpenAI and Anthropic focused on improving code quality through Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards. By November, these agents had improved enough to be used reliably for real work without constant corrections.
- ▪OpenAI and Anthropic enhanced coding agents using Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards.
- ▪The quality of code produced by these models improved dramatically in late 2025.
- ▪By November, coding agents became reliable enough for daily use without frequent errors.
Simon Willison files mainly under blogs. We currently carry 51 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Simon Willison's Weblog |
| Canonical URL | https://simonwillison.net/2026/May/19/5-minute-llms/#atom-everything |
| Publication time | 2026-05-19T01:09:44+00:00 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-19T01:16:58.642Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-19T01:19:00.325Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | 40bmyEi575w5 |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
# It took a little while for this to become clear, but the real news from November was that the coding agents got good. OpenAI and Anthropic had spent most of 2025 running Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards to increase the quality of code written by their models, especially when paired up with their Codex and Claude Code agent harnesses. In November the results of this work became apparent. Coding agents went from often-work to mostly-work, crossing a quality barrier where you could use them as a daily-driver to get real work done, without needing to spend most of your time fixing their stupid mistakes.
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Simon Willison's Weblog.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Simon Willison's Weblog
