WeSearch
The More It Says, the More You Pay: A Black-Box Audit of Token Inflation in LLM

The More It Says, the More You Pay: A Black-Box Audit of Token Inflation in LLM

·3 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 9 views
More from arXiv.org ai Compare coverage Trending Talk Blindspots Daily Sources Live wire
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

Dishonest providers can covertly manipulate generation to inflate output tokens while largely preserving task utility. We define such manipulation as a Provider-Side Token Inflation Attack (PTIA) and instantiate five representative attacks at the query, prompt, representation, and model levels of the provider-controlled pipeline. Our experiments show that each attack increases mean output length to more than 10.2x the clean baseline, demonstrating PTIA's financial appeal and feasibility at multiple stages of generation.

Key facts
About this source

Hacker News (AI / LLM) files mainly under ai. We currently carry 5,446 of its stories.

Original article
arXiv.org
Read full at arXiv.org →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherarXiv.org
Canonical URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20370
Publication timeFri, 18 Sep 2026 07:07:12 +0000
Retrieval time2026-09-18T07:18:45.906Z
Last seen2026-09-18T07:18:45.906Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusterOBLVuRa276rc · 1 stories
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Computer Science > Cryptography and Security arXiv:2609.20370 (cs) [Submitted on 17 Sep 2026] Title:The More It Says, the More You Pay: A Black-Box Audit of Provider-Side Token Inflation in LLM Services Authors:Leilei Chen, Lan Zhang, Chen Tang, Pengcheng Sun, Jiewei Lai, Yixiao Huang, Zhaopeng Zhang, Xinpeng Shen View a PDF of the paper titled The More It Says, the More You Pay: A Black-Box Audit of Provider-Side Token Inflation in LLM Services, by Leilei Chen and 7 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:In pay-per-token LLM services, the more a model says, the more users pay. Dishonest providers can covertly manipulate generation to inflate output tokens while largely preserving task utility.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at arXiv.org.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from arXiv.org