The National Academy of Sciences endorses the impossible
29) in 2016: “Event attribution questions are often posed in terms of a specific actual event, but definitive attribution of a specific event in a deterministic manner is generally not possible.” Have matters changed much in terms of climate predictions over the last decade? No, they have not: The climate models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change were no better in 2021 than in 2014: They continue to overpredict atmospheric temperature trends by a factor of about 2.5. Recommended Stories The National Academy of Sciences endorses the impossible Trump enacted the policies that made lower grocery prices possible Reagan was right about Daniel Ortega all along NAS was correct then and wrong now.
- ▪29) in 2016: “Event attribution questions are often posed in terms of a specific actual event, but definitive attribution of a specific event in a deterministic manner is generally not possible.” Have matters changed much in terms of climat
- ▪No, they have not: The climate models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change were no better in 2021 than in 2014: They continue to overpredict atmospheric temperature trends by a factor of about 2.5.
- ▪Recommended Stories The National Academy of Sciences endorses the impossible Trump enacted the policies that made lower grocery prices possible Reagan was right about Daniel Ortega all along NAS was correct then and wrong now.
Washington Examiner files mainly under politics. We currently carry 2,230 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Washington Examiner |
| Canonical URL | https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/faith-freedom-self-reliance/4667403/national-academy-sciences-endorses-impossible/ |
| Publication time | Wed, 29 Jul 2026 15:27:41 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-07-29T15:38:56.910Z |
| Last seen | 2026-07-29T15:38:56.910Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | 7YUC5q8t608w · 1 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
In a new report, the National Academy of Sciences endorses “extreme event attribution (EEA), a field of climate science that analyzes whether and to what extent human-caused climate change influenced an individual extreme weather or climate event.” This endorsement is based upon purported “expanded observational datasets, large-ensemble simulations, and methodological advancements over the past decade…”This is balderdash, as the NAS itself concluded (p. 29) in 2016: “Event attribution questions are often posed in terms of a specific actual event, but definitive attribution of a specific event in a deterministic manner is generally not possible.” Have matters changed much in terms of climate predictions over the last decade? No, they have not: The climate models used by the…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Washington Examiner.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Washington Examiner
