WeSearch

The Senate Didn’t Kill Trump’s Ballroom. It Dodged the Security Bill.

3 sources covered this compare →
Coverage diverges in the framing of the Senate's actions and the implications of Trump's requests. PJ Media emphasizes a narrative of political cartoonishness, portraying Trump's demands as frivolous and criticizing others for their fiscal…
David Manney· ·5 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 22 views
#politics#security#legislation
The Senate Didn’t Kill Trump’s Ballroom. It Dodged the Security Bill.
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

The Senate faced challenges in passing a $1 billion security provision linked to upgrades for the White House and Secret Service. The proposal was complicated by a ruling from the Senate Parliamentarian that it did not fit within the reconciliation bill. This situation has led to political tensions between Republicans and Democrats, particularly regarding funding priorities and the optics of the proposed ballroom.

Key facts
Original article
PJ Media · David Manney
Read full at PJ Media →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

The Senate Didn’t Kill Trump’s Ballroom. It Dodged the Security Bill. David Manney | 6:05 PM on May 20, 2026 AP Photo/Alex Brandon The latest White House ballroom fight has already been flattened into the usual Washington cartoon: President Donald Trump demanding taxpayer money for chandeliers while everyone else pretends to guard fiscal virtue. Advertisement googletag.cmd.push(function () { googletag.display("div-gpt-300x250_3"); //googletag.pubads().refresh([gptAdSlot["div-gpt-300x250_3"]]) }); The facts point elsewhere. Senate Republicans dropped, or had to rework, a $1 billion provision tied to White House and Secret Service security upgrades after Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonogh ruled it didn't fit inside the reconciliation bill.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at PJ Media.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from PJ Media