The solution might be cancelling my AI subscription
The article discusses the challenges of managing AI tools and their impact on productivity. David Wilson shares his experience of creating numerous projects with AI, highlighting the distraction and lack of commitment that often accompany these tools. He concludes that curtailing AI use may be necessary to develop discipline and focus.
- ▪David Wilson lists over 16 projects he created using AI tools.
- ▪He notes that AI can lead to distraction and a lack of commitment to projects.
- ▪Wilson suggests that limiting AI use may be essential for developing discipline.
Simon Willison files mainly under blogs. We currently carry 73 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Simon Willison's Weblog |
| Canonical URL | https://simonwillison.net/2026/May/31/the-solution-might-be-cancelling-my-ai-subscription/#atom-everything |
| Publication time | 2026-05-31T16:31:32+00:00 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-31T16:37:46.968Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-31T16:37:46.968Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | tzRQckBzOsaV |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
The solution might be cancelling my AI subscription (via) I find this post by David Wilson very relatable. David lists 16+ projects he's spun up with AI tooling, and concludes: I didn't mean to build most of these things. Usually the Claude session started with something like "write a quick script for X", and one hour later the result is not a quick script for X, nor in the usual case is my problem solved, whatever the original itch happened to be. On that last point, this technology is horrific for attention. It's a thermonuclear ADHD amplifier and I have seen the same effect in every single one of my adult friends.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Simon Willison's Weblog.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Simon Willison's Weblog
