These dividend stocks beat the TSX over 25 years
They include dividend reinvestment but not fund fees, taxes, commissions or other trading costs. The portfolios are rebalanced monthly.)The return boost suggests that investors can do well – and possibly better than the index – by buying a diversified portfolio of Canadian dividend payers for the long term. Along the way, dividends can be used to buy new stocks or to top up existing holdings.
- ▪They include dividend reinvestment but not fund fees, taxes, commissions or other trading costs.
- ▪The portfolios are rebalanced monthly.)The return boost suggests that investors can do well – and possibly better than the index – by buying a diversified portfolio of Canadian dividend payers for the long term.
- ▪Along the way, dividends can be used to buy new stocks or to top up existing holdings.
The Globe and Mail publishes from Canada and files mainly under world. We currently carry 1,859 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | The Globe and Mail |
| Canonical URL | https://www.theglobeandmail.com/investing/markets/inside-the-market/article-these-dividend-stocks-beat-the-tsx-over-25-years/ |
| Publication time | Mon, 27 Jul 2026 09:09:43 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-07-27T09:26:11.564Z |
| Last seen | 2026-07-27T09:26:21.149Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | DllguV4bMBKy · 1 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
ShareSave for laterPlease log in to bookmark this story.Log InCreate Free AccountThe Canadian stock market hit a series of new highs in recent months, and Canadian dividend payers fared even better.Add up the gains and the S&P/TSX Composite Index climbed 32.9 per cent over the 12 months to the end of June, while today’s featured portfolio of dividend stocks with generous-but-not-extreme yields advanced by 35.5 per cent.To set the stage, low-fee passive investors in Canada enjoyed solid gains over the long term with the S&P/TSX Composite Index climbing at an average annual rate of 9.0 per cent over the roughly 25.2 years from the end of April, 2001, through to the end of June this year.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Globe and Mail.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from The Globe and Mail
