WeSearch

Tillis: ‘Stupid’ Trump compensation fund ‘beyond the pale’

3 sources covered this ⚠ Left-only compare →
Coverage diverges in tone and emphasis, with CNBC and The Hill focusing on Tillis's critical remarks about the fund, framing it as a bipartisan concern. In contrast, CBS News highlighted the intensity of the meeting, emphasizing Senator…
·4 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 32 views
#tillis#stupid#trump#compensation#fund
Tillis: ‘Stupid’ Trump compensation fund ‘beyond the pale’
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

Senate Tillis: ‘Stupid’ Trump compensation fund ‘beyond the pale’ Comments: by Sarah Davis - 05/22/26 9:57 AM ET Comments: Link copied by Sarah Davis - 05/22/26 9:57 AM ET Comments: Link copied NOW PLAYING GOP Sen. Thom Tillis (N.C.) on Thursday slammed the Trump administration’s announcement of a $1.776 billion “anti-weaponization” fund, joining other Republican senators in criticizing it both privately and publicly. The GOP senator called on his Republican colleagues to “speak up” to oppose this move.

Key facts
Original article
The Hill
Read full at The Hill →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Senate Tillis: ‘Stupid’ Trump compensation fund ‘beyond the pale’ Comments: by Sarah Davis - 05/22/26 9:57 AM ET Comments: Link copied by Sarah Davis - 05/22/26 9:57 AM ET Comments: Link copied NOW PLAYING GOP Sen. Thom Tillis (N.C.) on Thursday slammed the Trump administration’s announcement of a $1.776 billion “anti-weaponization” fund, joining other Republican senators in criticizing it both privately and publicly. The GOP senator called on his Republican colleagues to “speak up” to oppose this move. “This is beyond the pale,” he told reporters in comments aired by CNN. “This is not good for my colleagues,” he continued. “There’s not one positive thing that could be spun out of this between now and November.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Hill.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from The Hill