Today in Supreme Court History: July 27, 1929
Politics Today in Supreme Court History: July 27, 1929 Josh Blackman | 7.27.2026 7:00 AM /27/1929: The Geneva Conventions are signed by United States. The Supreme Court would consider the Conventions in Hamdan v.
- ▪Politics Today in Supreme Court History: July 27, 1929 Josh Blackman | 7.27.2026 7:00 AM /27/1929: The Geneva Conventions are signed by United States.
- ▪The Supreme Court would consider the Conventions in Hamdan v.
2 outlets in our directory ran this story, first to last over 24 hours. All of the coverage we found sits in one bucket: lean right. That one-sidedness is itself worth noticing.
- ▪ Today in Supreme Court History: July 26, 1892 — Reason.com
Reason Magazine files mainly under politics. We currently carry 454 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Reason Magazine |
| Canonical URL | https://reason.com/volokh/2026/07/27/today-in-supreme-court-history-july-27-1929-7/ |
| Publication time | Mon, 27 Jul 2026 11:00:13 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-07-27T11:12:28.078Z |
| Last seen | 2026-07-27T11:12:38.418Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | pCL22hTP_Cbe · 4 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Politics Today in Supreme Court History: July 27, 1929 Josh Blackman | 7.27.2026 7:00 AM /27/1929: The Geneva Conventions are signed by United States. The Supreme Court would consider the Conventions in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2006). <img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-8030058" src="https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/q60/uploads/2019/10/2006-2009-Roberts-300x238.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="238" srcset="https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/q60/uploads/2019/10/2006-2009-Roberts-300x238.jpg 300w, https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/q60/uploads/2019/10/2006-2009-Roberts.jpg 500w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />The Roberts Court (2006)
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Reason Magazine.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Reason Magazine
