WeSearch

Trump administration admits it canceled $7.6 billion in clean energy projects ‘based solely on the political identity of the grant recipient’s state’

9 sources covered this compare →
Lean Left: 3 (NYT > Top Stories, The Guardian — World, NBC News — Politics).
Matthew Daly· ·3 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 7 views
#trump#administration#admits#canceled#billion
Trump administration admits it canceled $7.6 billion in clean energy projects ‘based solely on the political identity of the grant recipient’s state’
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

Democrats and environmental groups seized on the court filing Friday, saying the administration had “weaponized” the federal government to kill good jobs and punish working families because of their political views. Democrats say what was ‘obvious’ has now been acknowledged “This administration has now admitted in court what has long been obvious: it terminated nearly 300 cost-cutting energy projects for no reason other than the fact that the states they were in did not vote for the president in the 2024 election,” said Rep. Both are high-ranking Democrats on the House and Senate Appropriations committees, respectively.

Key facts
How this story was covered

8 outlets in our directory ran this story, first to last over 21 hours. Coverage spans 3 points on the political spectrum — 3 lean left, 2 centre, 1 lean right.

Lean left · 3Centre · 2Lean right · 1
About this source

Fortune files mainly under business. We currently carry 566 of its stories.

Original article
Fortune · Matthew Daly
Read full at Fortune →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

The Trump administration has acknowledged in court documents that it canceled $7.6 billion in grants for hundreds of clean energy projects “based solely on the political identity of the grant recipient’s state” — in this case, 16 states that voted for Democrat Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election.Recommended Video The statement contradicts repeated assertions by Energy Secretary Chris Wright and other officials that the projects were canceled because they did not adequately advance the nation’s energy needs or had other problems that made them a poor investment of taxpayer dollars.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Fortune.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Fortune