WeSearch

Trump cites a Supreme Court dissent that lost 6–3 to gut endangered-species protections

Jason Weisberger· ·2 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 5 views
Trump cites a Supreme Court dissent that lost 6–3 to gut endangered-species protections
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

The Supreme Court's 6–3 majority upheld the definition Trump's administration just erased. For 50 years, the definition of "harm" included any significant habitat modification that killed or injured wildlife by disrupting their breeding, feeding, or sheltering grounds. Trump's new rule negates that definition effective September 14, in favor of a losing dissent, making it easier to drill, log, mine, and build where endangered animals live.

Key facts
About this source

Boing Boing files mainly under tech. We currently carry 434 of its stories.

Original article
Boing Boing · Jason Weisberger
Read full at Boing Boing →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherBoing Boing
Canonical URLhttps://boingboing.net/2026/08/05/trump-cites-a-supreme-court-dissent-that-lost-6-3-to-gut-endangered-species-protections.html
Publication timeWed, 05 Aug 2026 16:08:42 +0000
Retrieval time2026-08-05T16:45:47.416Z
Last seen2026-08-05T16:45:47.416Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
Cluster2bJ7SlLDiuoN · 1 stories
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Trump cites a Supreme Court dissent that lost 6–3 to gut endangered-species protections Jason Weisberger 9:08 am Wed Aug 5, 2026 A bald eagle (FloridaStock/shutterstock.com) The Orange Menace claims his administration restored the Endangered Species Act to the meaning Antonin Scalia "explained." Scalia explained it in a dissent. The Supreme Court's 6–3 majority upheld the definition Trump's administration just erased. For 50 years, the definition of "harm" included any significant habitat modification that killed or injured wildlife by disrupting their breeding, feeding, or sheltering grounds. Trump's new rule negates that definition effective September 14, in favor of a losing dissent, making it easier to drill, log, mine, and build where endangered animals live.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Boing Boing.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Boing Boing