Trump’s Slush Fund Is Based on a Lie
The article critiques Donald Trump's creation of an 'Anti-Weaponization Fund,' arguing it falsely portrays him and his supporters as victims of political persecution. It highlights the violent actions of January 6th insurrectionists and their subsequent pardons, suggesting that they should not be seen as victims. The piece also discusses Trump's attempts to influence legal proceedings against his critics, emphasizing the problematic nature of his actions.
- ▪Trump's 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' claims to compensate victims of government overreach, but is criticized as a false narrative.
- ▪The January 6th rioters, who caused significant harm during the Capitol assault, are portrayed as criminals rather than victims.
- ▪Trump's actions to influence legal cases against his critics raise ethical concerns about presidential conduct.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Trump’s Slush Fund Is Based on a LieThe real victims of lawfare and weaponized prosecutions aren’t the insurrectionists.Mona CharenMay 26, 2026ShareTrump supporters clash with police and security forces as people try to storm the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Brent Stirton/Getty Images)THE ORWELLIAN “ANTI-WEAPONIZATION FUND” Trump has created—the legal equivalent of twirling the combination lock on Fort Knox and driving off with gold bars—purports to be righting a wrong.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Bulwark.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from The Bulwark
