US military unleashes another round of attacks on Iran for the third consecutive night
World News US military unleashes another round of attacks on Iran for the third consecutive night By Victor Nava Published July 13, 2026, 5:31 p.m. Add The New York Post on Google President Trump ordered another wave of airstrikes against Iran Monday, marking the third consecutive night the US military has battered regime targets. ET today, US Central Command began launching the third consecutive night of strikes against Iran, at the Commander in Chief’s direction,” read a statement released by the combatant command.
- ▪World News US military unleashes another round of attacks on Iran for the third consecutive night By Victor Nava Published July 13, 2026, 5:31 p.m.
- ▪Add The New York Post on Google President Trump ordered another wave of airstrikes against Iran Monday, marking the third consecutive night the US military has battered regime targets.
- ▪ET today, US Central Command began launching the third consecutive night of strikes against Iran, at the Commander in Chief’s direction,” read a statement released by the combatant command.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
World News US military unleashes another round of attacks on Iran for the third consecutive night By Victor Nava Published July 13, 2026, 5:31 p.m. ET (function() { var overlay = document.getElementById("nyp-player-lcp-overlay"); if (!overlay) { return; } function hideOverlay() { overlay.remove(); } function afterDCL() { requestAnimationFrame(hideOverlay); } if (document.readyState === "loading") { document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", afterDCL, { once: true }); } else { afterDCL(); } })(); See more of our coverage in your search results. Add The New York Post on Google President Trump ordered another wave of airstrikes against Iran Monday, marking the third consecutive night the US military has battered regime targets. “At 4:45 p.m.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at New York Post.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from New York Post
