Were the Constitution’s Authors a Little Too Optimistic?
The article discusses the concerns of the framers of the U.S. Constitution regarding the powers of the presidency. They aimed to create a strong executive while also establishing checks to prevent tyranny. Current events, particularly the second Trump presidency, are prompting scholars to reevaluate whether the Constitution effectively balances these powers.
- ▪The framers of the Constitution were aware of the potential dangers of a powerful presidency.
- ▪Benjamin Franklin expressed concerns about the future of the presidency at the Constitutional Convention.
- ▪Some scholars argue that the second Trump presidency challenges the effectiveness of the Constitution's checks and balances.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
#masthead-section-label, #masthead-bar-one { display: none }U.S.A. at 250Guide to FestivitiesSummer Travel ChecklistConnection to BarbadosSpanish in the GulfBenjamin Franklin’s ParisKnox’s Audacious TrekYou have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.IdeasWere the Constitution’s Authors a Little Too Optimistic?The nation’s founding document has a blind spot. Trump is making it visible.The founders of the United States wanted a powerful chief executive, but one that was restrained in the use of that power.Credit...Tom Brenner for The New York TimesSkip to contentSkip to site indexIdeasWere the Constitution’s Authors a Little Too Optimistic?The nation’s founding document has a blind spot.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at NYT > Top Stories.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from NYT > Top Stories
