WeSearch

West Ham United could have signed Khvicha Kvaratskhelia for €20m but paid €35m for Nikola Vlasic instead

·2 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 10 views
#football#transfers#west ham#kvaratskhelia#vlasic
West Ham United could have signed Khvicha Kvaratskhelia for €20m but paid €35m for Nikola Vlasic instead
⚡ TL;DR · AI summary

West Ham United missed the opportunity to sign Khvicha Kvaratskhelia for €20 million, opting instead to pay €35 million for Nikola Vlasic. Vlasic's tenure at West Ham was disappointing, leading to his departure after just one season. Kvaratskhelia has since become a top player, raising questions about West Ham's decision-making in the transfer market.

Key facts
Original article
Yahoo Sports
Read full at Yahoo Sports →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

{"@context":"http://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","mainEntityOfPage":"https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/west-ham-united-could-signed-085500706.html","headline":"West Ham United could have signed Khvicha Kvaratskhelia for €20m but paid €35m for Nikola Vlasic instead","datePublished":"2026-05-30T08:55:00.000Z","dateModified":"2026-05-30T08:55:00.000Z","keywords":["Newcastle United","West Ham United","Khvicha Kvaratskhelia","Nikola Vlasic","CSKA Moscow","Dinamo Batumi","Paris Saint-Germain","Napoli"],"description":"West Ham United and Newcastle United were both keen on signing Paris Saint-Germain attacker Khvicha Kvaratskhelia in 2021 and 2022, respectively.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Yahoo Sports.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Yahoo Sports