What If Lock-In Doesn’t Matter So Much Anymore?
The article discusses the decreasing significance of programming language lock-in due to advancements in agentic programming. It highlights the rapid rewrite of the Bun toolkit in Rust, completed in just six days, showcasing the flexibility of modern programming practices. This trend is reflected in various technology sectors, where companies feel more comfortable switching languages or frameworks as needed.
- ▪Mitchell Hashimoto notes that programming languages are becoming less of a lock-in factor in modern development.
- ▪The Bun toolkit was rewritten in Rust in just six days, demonstrating the ease of switching programming languages.
- ▪Companies are increasingly willing to adopt new technologies, knowing they can revert to previous solutions if necessary.
kottke.org files mainly under culture. We currently carry 71 of its stories.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
posted May 20 @ 05:25 PM by Jason Kottke · gift link What If Lock-In Doesn’t Matter So Much Anymore? Interesting observation by Mitchell Hashimoto (creator of Vagrant and Ghostty) on how a company’s or product’s choice of programming language matters less in the age of agentic programming: On the interesting side is how fungible programming languages are nowadays. Programming languages used to be LOCK IN, and they’re increasingly not so. You think the Bun rewrite in Rust is good for Rust? Bun has shown they can be in probably any language they want in roughly a week or two. Rust is expendable. It’s useful until it’s not then it can be thrown out.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at kottke.org.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from kottke.org
