WeSearch
When Fancy Eviction Fails: Rethinking Cache Replacement for LLM Prefix Reuse

When Fancy Eviction Fails: Rethinking Cache Replacement for LLM Prefix Reuse

·3 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 12 views
More from arXiv.org ai Compare coverage Trending Talk Blindspots Daily Sources Live wire
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

Researchers analyzed production traces to evaluate cache replacement algorithms for LLM prefix reuse, finding that sophisticated policies offer little benefit over standard LRU. The study attributes this to the regular pacing of active sessions, which makes recency a highly predictive metric for prefix reuse. The authors propose a new management strategy that retains recency as a foundation while adding specific mechanisms for demoting one-hit prefixes and handling compute-intensive misses.

Key facts
About this source

Hacker News (AI / LLM) files mainly under ai. We currently carry 7,248 of its stories.

Original article
arXiv.org
Read full at arXiv.org →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherarXiv.org
Canonical URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28870
Publication timeThu, 01 Oct 2026 21:44:44 +0000
Retrieval time2026-10-01T21:52:55.986Z
Last seen2026-10-01T21:52:55.986Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClustermD0bHDzNLVTh · 1 stories
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Computer Science > Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing arXiv:2609.28870 (cs) [Submitted on 24 Sep 2026] Title:When Fancy Eviction Fails: Rethinking Cache Replacement For LLM Prefix Reuse Authors:Yiyu Liu, Minlan Yu, Juncheng Yang View a PDF of the paper titled When Fancy Eviction Fails: Rethinking Cache Replacement For LLM Prefix Reuse, by Yiyu Liu and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Long-running LLM applications repeatedly send growing context, making prefix caching critical for reducing prefill cost. Yet prefix-cache behavior under agentic workloads remains poorly understood. We study production traces from two companies and evaluate 14 eviction algorithms across HBM-constrained and large memory-pool settings.

…

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at arXiv.org.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from arXiv.org